<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 300 HP Celica Supercharger Kit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/300-hp-celica-supercharger-kit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/300-hp-celica-supercharger-kit</link>
	<description>Supercharger performance news and home of the supercharger calculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:56:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/300-hp-celica-supercharger-kit/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superchargerperformance.com/?p=648#comment-21</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, that was a slip up... I meant to say that positive displacement superchargers do not lack top end pull. The reason many people assume that they do is because they talk about factory supercharged cars where the OEM choose to fit a smaller supercharger than is need ... for example putting an Eaton M45 on a smaller V6 engine to peak out at 200hp... 

This may be fine in factory, trim, but if you try to get more top end out of it, you&#039;ll find that your undersized supercharger is out of breathe.

Has more to do with right charger selection, than it does with superchargers not being able to deliver top end power... 

Thanks for the correction ! Awesome !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, that was a slip up&#8230; I meant to say that positive <a target="_blank" href="http://www.superchargerperformance.com/supercharger-power-parts/engine-perfrmance-parts-simplified-%e2%80%93-part-1-%e2%80%93-raw-power">displacement</a> superchargers do not lack top end pull. The reason many people assume that they do is because they talk about factory supercharged cars where the OEM choose to fit a smaller supercharger than is need &#8230; for example putting an <a target="_blank" href="http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/a-snap-shot-of-eatons-superchargers">eaton</a> M45 on a smaller V6 engine to peak out at 200hp&#8230; </p>
<p>This may be fine in factory, trim, but if you try to get more top end out of it, you&#8217;ll find that your undersized supercharger is out of breathe.</p>
<p>Has more to do with right charger selection, than it does with superchargers not being able to deliver top end power&#8230; </p>
<p>Thanks for the correction ! Awesome !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/300-hp-celica-supercharger-kit/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superchargerperformance.com/?p=648#comment-20</guid>
		<description>The Eaton M62 is not a Centrifical Supercharger as you posted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.superchargerperformance.com/aftermarket-supercharger-performance/a-snap-shot-of-eatons-superchargers">eaton</a> M62 is not a Centrifical Supercharger as you posted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
